The Random Comic Strip

The Random Comic Strip

Words to live by...

"How beautiful it is to do nothing, and to rest afterward."

[Spanish Proverb]

Ius luxuriae publice datum est

(The right to looseness has been officially given)

"Everyone carries a part of society on his shoulders," wrote Ludwig von Mises, "no one is relieved of his share of responsibility by others. And no one can find a safe way for himself if society is sweeping towards destruction. Therefore everyone, in his own interest, must thrust himself vigorously into the intellectual battle."

Apparently, the crossword puzzle that disappeared from the blog, came back.


Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Freedom of Speech

Free speech is a powerful right. It frightens people in power, it empowers people out of it. It is one of several that are integral to my country's history. As a blogger, it is the primary right. Having grown up in this country, I have always taken this right for granted. Even when I was told when to speak by my parents, even when I was told I did not have that right while I was in school. Even at those times, I still thought I had that right and thought nothing more about it.

I learned what it was like to not have it while in the Navy. First, because you really do not have that as an unfettered right while you are a member of the military. Your political activity is restricted and your ability to speak out is restricted. It isn't completely suppressed but it is severely restricted. Second, I visited a couple of countries where freedom of speech was not protected at all. I saw the reluctance in the people of those countries to speak about internal political matters or leaders.

There have been three recent examples of free speech in the news that caught my attention.

The first is the Beauty Queen incident. I don't watch beauty pageants. They bore me. And most people, even those who watch such fine entertainment as Judge Judy, Maury, and the E! cable channel, tend to ignore the telecasts. Less people probably know who the current Miss America is than know who the current vice-president is. This beauty contest was for the Miss USA title. An even lesser known pageant that is the precursor to the Miss Universe contest. Miss Universe? Are there entrants from Alpha Centauri? But I digress...

During this critically important pageant, one of the contestants was asked a controversial question. She was asked to give her opinion on the issue of gay marriage. Since then we have been subjected to regular reports about the trials and tribulations she has suffered as a result of her less than politically acceptable answer. Whether you favor gay marriage or not, what earthly importance is the question to the choice of who will win a beauty contest? Did anyone ever really care what the prom queen thought about world events? Of course not, nor did anyone care what the prom king thought either. Most of us weren't concerned about their brains.

The second example was at the White House Correspondents Dinner. This is an event where people make jokes about important and powerful people without fear of reprisal. Allegedly. In reality, we find there are limits about what can be said. Wanda Sykes may have exercised some poor taste in her diatribe about Rush Limbaugh. So we have been subjected to multiple stories about that incident that will probably die out before the Beauty Queen's. Oddly, Ms Sykes exercised her freedom of speech as she denounced Limbaugh's and called him a "traitor."

Finally, we come to the story of a former vice-president who is currently speaking his mind about current policies and fellow political party members. Now, various pols and talking heads are running about suggesting he should be quiet, that he shouldn't speak his mind.

I don't understand the fuss over any of these. I thought freedom of speech meant you could speak out about political matters. After all, the real purpose of that First Amendment was to protect political speech. It really wasn't about pornography or artistic expression. It was about the right to speak out about government policies and activities. The other things were "discovered" by the courts rather recently.

What I have observed over the years, however, is that most people do not really support free speech. Oh, they say they do. But what they really mean is they support speech they agree with and other speech that they don't care much about. But the ideas they oppose? Oh no, those are an abuse of the right. These people should lose their titles as Miss California, Wanda Sykes should be disavowed by the administration, Rush Limbaugh should be taken off the air, Dick Cheney should go to Wyoming and shut up.

What are their detractors so afraid of?

11 comments:

Rae said...

This is a very interesting post. I think anyone who degrades or denies someone of their right to free speech should be forced to live out of this country for a period of time.

Regardless of our flaws, I love my country. Sometimes I find it difficult to be tolerant but I certainly don't want any of our freedoms changed.

Thank you for sharing this.

Pearl said...

Civil discourse has crumbled in this country. The screaming, the shouting, the finger-pointing, the cries of "you hate America" have brought us to the point where we are either sharply divided or afraid to speak.
Pearl

p.s. Don't you worry about Miss California. :-) The topless photos of her are out, she's joined a group devoted to opposing gay unions/marriage. The gal's got a couple irons in the fire!

Neo said...

freedom of speech lives, just the fact that you can disagree is proof of that. Though I do not follow their belief, the KKK is granted a permit for Christmas decor on "Fountain Square" here in Cincinnati.
Freedom of Speech is the right to voice your opinion no matter how popular it is

ps. What about division of church and state? The founding fathers meant this as the church not have power over the government, not to keep children from praying in school or putting the 10 commandments on a building.(this does kind of link in with Freedom of Speech)
do you not "swear on a bible" in court?

Neo said...

oh, I forgot to say, I always find your posts to be interesting

Douglas said...

Rae* - I have some of the same concerns though I would rather suggest that everyone who can experience life in a more closely controlled nation rather than be forced to.

Pearl - I never worry about the fate of the pretty girls, they always manage to bounce back.

Neo - Freedom of Speech does live, that is clear. But it constantly has to fight for that life. We do not so much have a government which attempts to suppress it but a populace which does. We sometimes create a little "dictatorship of popular opinion". When this happens, people who express contrary ideas (unpopular opinions) are subjected to a barrage of criticism and ridicule. This can be as dangerous as outright censorship.

There are many ironic contradictions between our written beliefs (Bill of Rights) and our actual practices.

Inspector Clouseau said...

There's lots of law out there, but what about the UK banning Michael Savage from entering the country and revoking his visa because it feels that he incites violence?

Douglas said...

Inspector - You are aware that the UK does not actually have a Constitution which guarantees freedom of speech? By that reasoning, they could have denied entry to Martin Luther King in the 60s. Just an example of what can happen when the government gets to decide what speech is permissible. But what about censorship by public acclaim? Or by disruption through protest (shouting down a speaker)?

The Jules said...

I would like to think that, by allowing free speech in (almost) all of its various incarnations, the truly dumb and dangerous would be given enough rope to hang themselves with.

However, the popularity of numerous bad ideas and policies both past and present makes me wonder if this is likely.

Reminds me of the Simpsons episode when, in front of a crowd shouting its opinions at him, the Mayor asks his aide "Are people getting louder or just stupider?" and the aide replies "Both, sir."

Douglas said...

Jules - The reason people are willing to allow censorship is because the truly dumb and dangerous can actually gather followers. The followers are also dumb and dangerous. What is not considered is that allowing them to speak allows the rest of us to know who they are. They are not underground, they are out in the open where they can be monitored more easily. I'd like to blame the poor quality of our educational system but I am afraid that isn't it. Look at the IQ curve sometime, maybe read The Bell Curve, and you will understand.

Neo said...

freedom of speech lives, just the fact that you can disagree is proof of that. Though I do not follow their belief, the KKK is granted a permit for Christmas decor on "Fountain Square" here in Cincinnati.
Freedom of Speech is the right to voice your opinion no matter how popular it is

ps. What about division of church and state? The founding fathers meant this as the church not have power over the government, not to keep children from praying in school or putting the 10 commandments on a building.(this does kind of link in with Freedom of Speech)
do you not "swear on a bible" in court?

Neo said...

oh, I forgot to say, I always find your posts to be interesting